Market Controversies · 2022 · Market Operations

LME Nickel: The Cost of Cancelling US$12bn of Trades

The LME cancelled lawful trades under emergency powers to save the system — English courts ruled it lawful, but nickel liquidity never fully returned.

Updated: 2026-10-21 Reading time: ~9 min Series: Market Controversies
Home / Compliance Guides / Market Controversies / LME Nickel

March 2022: nickel prices went vertical — from ~$30,000 to over $100,000/tonne in days — and the London Metal Exchange, wholly owned by HKEX, used emergency powers to cancel US$12 billion of lawfully executed trades. It saved the clearing system from a default cascade. It also destroyed trust that took decades to build.

US$12bnlawful trades cancelled retroactively
250%+price move in two days
£13.8bnHKEX's acquisition cost for LME (2012)
English courtsruled the cancellation lawful — market trust still unrecovered

1. What actually happened

2. The triple role conflict

RoleWhat it wantedConflict
Market operatorContinuous, fair tradingHalted the market mid-crisis
Clearing guarantorPrevent member default cascadeChose system survival over trade sanctity
HKEX subsidiaryProtect parent's reputation + returnsHong Kong shareholders inherit LME's operational risk

RegSir's take

The LME was legally right — the rulebook's emergency powers existed, courts confirmed it — and institutionally catastrophic. The precedent it set: executed trades are provisional, not final. Markets price certainty; once participants learn that fills can be un-fills, liquidity reprices permanently. Nickel volumes never fully returned. For Hong Kong, the lesson is structural: HKEX's commodity expansion exported reputation risk home — the £13.8bn bet bought both diversification and a liability that materialised at the worst moment. An exchange's emergency powers should be exercised as surgery, not as a market-undo button.

3. Compliance takeaways

4. Official sources & reporting

Document / reportLink
LME notices — nickel trading suspension & trade cancellation (March 2022)lme.com ↗
Elliott Management & Jane Street v LME — English High Court rulingsjudiciary.uk ↗
FCA enforcement — £9.2m fine on LME for systems & controls failuresfca.org.uk ↗
SHARE THIS ANALYSIS WhatsApp Telegram LinkedIn X

How would your case be characterised? Ask RegSir.

Describe the facts — RegSir analyses them against the Securities and Futures Ordinance, SFC guidance and enforcement precedent, provision by provision.

Try 3 questions free →